VIEW: 19-35: Still Problems With Courts

VIEW FROM HERE
By Bob McDowell (Born Neil Carson) Number 19-35
STILL PROBLEMS WITH COURTS Week of 2019/09/02
It seems, as it has since the Administration of PRESJC-39 (James Earl
Carter-D, GA, Gov.) was permitted by congressional action to nominate to the
Federal District Courts more than twice the number of judges that had been
serving prior to his being in office. Somewhere in his early days in office a cry
rose that the Federal District Judges were 'swamped with cases' and overworked.
The total Democrat majority in Congress obediently and promptly passed
legislation to double the number of seats. Thus he was able to nominate a number
equivalent to the total number of judges before, PLUS whatever number of seats
were, or became, vacant, and in lock-step the Senate Democrat majority did not
refuse even one.
While not every one by name and background was made known to me
those that were, were of the "ignore the Constitution and rule according to
personal bias" attitude, history has indicated that all were. That was the
beginning of the serious problems stemming from the decisions being handed
down. Since the District Appellate Courts were included in the increase, the
misguided decisions were upheld when appealed to them. Those of us of adult
age during that election of 1976 well remember the weak campaign waged by
PRESGF-38, R, who as Vice-President had served out the remaining term of
PRESRN-37 who resigned because of a massive attack on him by Democrats
and media over a 'break-in' to one of their offices.
A recent example of such a "judicial bias" ruling appeared in the daily
paper here on July 25. The headline read "Judge blocks Trump asylum
restrictions". Reporting credit was given to "Amy Taxin and Ashraf Khalil of
the Associated Press". It stated that a ruling by "U. S. District Judge Jon Tiger
in San Francisco (Thank you for that information) came down hours after
another federal judge in Washington, D. C. let the 9-day-old policy stand". Four
paragraphs further down in the story it was reported that "Tiger, who was
appointed by former President Barack Obama, halted another Trump policy last
year to deny asylum to people who crossed the border illegally". It seems to me
that Judge Tiger is a prime example of 'legislating from the Bench'. This, in my
opinion, should call for immediate Congressional investigation toward impeach-
ment!! So, members in control of the House are showing their own bias by
ignoring the judges' decision and taking no action, to the detriment of our
Nation and it's population.
Since that time there have been far too many decisions, with the effect of
establishing law, handed down and accepted by the appellate courts, and in some
cases the Supreme Court, that to thinking and knowledgeable citizens went
contrary to the "law of the land" established by the Constitution. These have
twisted the meaning of the term "Constitutional" and had adverse effect on our
GOD given freedoms and rights. Even Madam Justice Ginsberg has been
reported by media to have stated, in a speech to an international meeting, that
she more often uses "International Law rather than the Constitution" in arriving at
decisions.
In normal and proper actions such decisions would have caused "Impeach-
ment" charges to have been brought to such offending jurists, and it is the
Constitutional duty of Congress to do so. But it has not happened because of the
almost continual Democrat majority there, especially in the House. Since it takes
a 2/3 majority in the Senate to rule an impeachment accomplished the votes have
not been gathered in the House..
Happily, PRESDT-45 has been able to have two more logical judges
appointed to the Supreme Court and a reported 197 to vacancies in District and
Appellate Federal Courts. Individuals who harbor strong bias, particularly on the
C/F/S side, tend to not take retirement but to stay so long as they can.
Remember; Federal judges at any level have an appointment for LIFE, if they
choose to remain. Also, the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court and
allows Congress to establish lower courts, which it has done. It is considered
possible that Madam Justice Ginsberg will choose retirement soon probably, in my
opinion, after the 2020 election, in case a Democrat wins. In that case we all will
be in deep danger and trouble, except of course those who would become the
rulers. Think about that!!!
END
Composed August 24, 2019
Robert W. McDowell, Jr. © 2019 841 Lynwood Lane
918-451-1051 Broken Arrow OK 74011-8608
Email: abdmcfpi@localnet.com