Fw: INSTRUCTIVE STATS ON GUN VIOLENCE-Not fake news

I felt this had to be forwarded for the stats and conclusions. Changed the Format from
'Rich' to 'Plain' to reduce the print and paper size and ease/time of send/receive.
It came in at 45 Kb and reduced to 6 Kb in 'Plain Text'
Jim DeLoach is the moderator/leader for our veterans group.

----- Original Message -----
From: Jdeloach
To: McDowell, Robert W. , Jr. , No. 2 ; Nancy Turlington ; rnale2@cox.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: INSTRUCTIVE STATS ON GUN VIOLENCE-Not fake news

On Aug 14, 2019, at 08:08, AT&T Yahoo Mail <gproyce@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
PLEASE PLEASE Read all of this'''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Subject: Fw: INSTRUCTIVE STATS ON GUN VIOLENCE-Not fake news

Strong words from Noah Webster:
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed."

Interesting statistics. This jibes with the research of Prof. Lott at the University
of
Chicago, who is a noted expert on gun laws and stats. Here are some facts:
There are 30,000 gun related death s per year by firearms, and this number is not
disputed The U.S. population is 324,059,091 as of June 22, 2016. Do the math:
0.00925% of the population dies from gun related actions each year. Statistically
speaking, this is insignificant! What is never told, however, is a breakdown of those
30,000 deaths, to put them in perspective as compared to other causes of death:
65% of those deaths are by suicide, which would never be prevented by gun laws.
15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified.
17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill persons – better
known as gun violence.
3% are accidental discharge deaths.
So technically, "gun violence" is not 30,000 annually, but drops to 5,100. Still too many?
Now let's look at how those deaths spanned across the nation.
480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over prior years)
So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of those cities
have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that is the root cause.
This basically leaves 3,825 for the entire rest of the nation, or about 75 deaths per state.
That is an average because some States have much higher rates than others. For
example, California had 1,169 and Alabama had 1.
Now, who has the strictest gun laws by far? California, of course, but understand,
it is not guns causing this. It is a crime rate spawned by the number of criminal persons
residing in those cities and states. So, if all cities and states are not created equal, then
there must be something other than the tool causing the gun deaths.
Are 5,100 deaths per year horrific? How about in comparison to other deaths?
All death is sad and especially so when it is in the commission of a crime but that is the
nature of crime. Robbery, death, rape, assaults are all done by criminals. It is ludicrous
to think that criminals will obey laws. That is why they are called criminals.
But what about other deaths each year?
40,000+ die from a drug overdose–THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT!
36,000 people die per year from the flu, far exceeding the criminal gun deaths.
34,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities(exceeding gun deaths even if you include
suicide).
Now it gets good:
200,000+ people die each year (and growing) from preventable medical errors You
are safer walking in the worst areas of Chicago than you are when you are in a hospital!
710,000 people die per year from heart disease. It's time to stop the double cheese-
burgers! So, what is the point? If the liberal loons and the anti-gun movement focused
their attention on heart disease, even a 10% decrease in cardiac deaths would save twice
the number of lives annually of all gun-related deaths (including suicide, law enforcement,
etc.).
A 10% reduction in medical errors would be 66% of the total number of gun deaths
or 4 times the number of criminal homicides ................ Simple, easily preventable 10%
reductions! So, you have to ask yourself, in the grand scheme of things, why the focus
on guns?
It's pretty simple:
Taking away guns gives control to governments. The founders of this nation knew
that regardless of the form of government, those in power may become corrupt and seek
to rule as the British did by trying to disarm the populace of the colonies. It is not
difficult
to understand that a disarmed populace is a controlled populace.
Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S.
Constitution. It must be preserved at all costs . So, the next time someone tries to tell you
that gun control is about saving lives, look at these facts and remember these words from
Noah Webster: "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed."