Really interesting and good question. More evidence that most of the
younger, louder, & radical members of Congress don't have a clue or are
acting deliberatly to the detriment of USA.
P.S. This message came in as "Rich Text" at one LETTER per line and
was automatically changed to 'Plain Text' upon touching the 'forward' key.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Solomon" <jim.solomon@shieldintl.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2019 3:07 PM
Subject: Fwd: look it up !! This is interesting--why have we not heard about this??
Wouldn't it be interesting if, at some point during the presidential campaign, if one
of the In candidates asked, "Oh, by the way, has anyone in Washington, D.C., ever
heard of the McCarran-Walter Act Of 1952?"
I did not know of this act until recently, but it has been a law for more than 65
years.
Here are the historic facts that would seem to indicate that many, if not most,
of the people we elect to work for us in Washington do not have the slightest idea
of what laws already exist in OUR country.
After several terrorist incidents were carried out in the United States, Donald
Trump was severely criticized for suggesting that the U.S. should limit or temporarily
suspend the immigration of certain ethnic groups, nationalities and even people of
certain religions (Muslims). The criticisms condemned such a suggestion as, among
other things, being un-American, dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous and racist.
Congressmen and senators swore that they would never allow such legislation,
and our president called such a prohibition on immigration unconstitutional.
As Gomer Pyle would say, "Well, surprise, surprise!"
It seems that the selective immigration ban is already law and has been applied on
several occasions.
Known as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of
1952 allows for the"suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by the
president, whenever the president finds that the entry of aliens or of any class of
aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States."
"The president may, by proclamation and for such a period as he shall deem
necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens, immigrants or non-
immigrants, or impose any restrictions on the entry of aliens he may deem to be
appropriate."
Who was president when this was passed? Democrat Harry Truman.
Who do you suppose last used this process? Democrat Jimmy Carter, no
less than 37 years ago, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States. But
Carter actually did more. He made ALL Iranian students, already in the United
States, check in with the government. And then he deported a bunch of them.
Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas and a total of 15,000
Iranians were forced to leave the USA in 1979.
So, what do you say about all of the criticism that Donald Trump received
from the Democratic senators, representatives and the Obama Administration?
Additionally, it is important to note that the McCarran-Walter Act also
requires that an "applicant for immigration must be of good moral character and
in agreement with the principles of our Constitution."
Therefore, one could surmise that since the Quran forbids Muslims to swear
allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, technically, ALL Muslims should, or could,
be refused immigration to OUR country.
Authenticated at: (look under 1952)
http://library.uwb.edu/Static/<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
Flibrary.uwb.edu%2FStatic%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb7688be7f9844abd0f9a08d71a79fc35%7C84df9e7fe9f64
0afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637006983529871740&sdata=sZWpOsp%2BRiYAGvOHrXovhzshRhDvVXxKjzawZv
PAtKs%3D&reserved=0> USimmigration/
USimmigrationlegislation.html
U.S.immigration/1952_ immigration and_nationality_ act.html
[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gi
f]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_
content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> Virus-free.
www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig
-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>
No comments:
Post a Comment